|Image: Idyllic Harbour Town of Symi, Greece|
|National Socialism Movement in Greece calling for|
the removal of all immigrants
|(Just Add Feta)|
"Greece - The Odyssey, Reporter: Philip Williams. We've seen and heard a great deal about the economic apocalypse thumping Greece. Violent protests, enormous pain, staggering job losses, lives destroyed. But that's not the complete picture. Meet the Greeks turning national disaster into personal triumph. They're not sitting around under the thunderheads of austerity waiting for the economy to turn and the sun to shine again. They're taking matters into their own hands."
There were some great suggestions and experiences by those who came back that showed a resilience to a bad economic situation and how they were able to adapt. They admitted that the consumerism and lifestyle of the bigger cities brought stress and that the life promised and promoted by it's leadership was false and fake. They found eventual happiness in a simpler way of life when they moved back to their smaller villages where they grew up which brought less stress. Pity that most of the world doesn't believe in a simpler way of life. But there were also some great points to come away with from this documentary about what many of these Greeks had to say about their own culture's invention of a type of government called Democracy which is championed today worldwide as mankind's savior and what they think of it now. For example, there was this one woman, Eleni Boubouli, who left her career and urban lifestyle and moved from the second largest Greek city of Thessaloniki to the countryside where she now has created an Herb business.
The reporter, Philip Williams asked her, "I've talked to many Greeks who say, you know, first of all it's the politicians, it's their fault."
Eleni Boubouli's response: "No, okay, but the politicians I think are people who we voted for. So if we people hadn't voted for them to do all this bad stuff that they did . . . some Greek people take responsibility and others don't, but we voted for them."
|Christos Rozakis being scolded by|
an elderly neighbour woman in his
hometown for not taking care of
business and having a child.
The setting is in the original nation of Israel where the Jews are wanting a King over them just like all the other Nations around them. They are apparently restless and dissatisfied with the simple arrangement of judges within their cities and communities offering guidance, settling disputes and generally keeping the peace among the people. So they are not content with their own God being their King as was originally set up. It would seem in their mind such a system of governance and direction was primitive and unsophisticated. They wanted a more modern trendy type of rule with all the pomp, ceremony and bragging rights that goes with it. The Prophet Samuel was appalled and displeased at the demand of the people. He took it as a personal failure, but was told that the people had not rejected him, but rejected their own Hebrew God Jehovah as King. The Prophet Samuel was told to warn the people of their collective community responsibility for insistence on having a King and the consequences they would experience under such a harsh ruling human king. Here is how one modern day, easier to understand contemporary translation "The Message Bible" renders the account:
1 Samuel 8:10-18
So Samuel told them, delivered God’s warning to the people who were asking him to give them a king. He said, “This is the way the kind of king you’re talking about operates. He’ll take your sons and make soldiers of them—chariotry, cavalry, infantry, regimented in battalions and squadrons. He’ll put some to forced labor on his farms, plowing and harvesting, and others to making either weapons of war or chariots in which he can ride in luxury. He’ll put your daughters to work as beauticians and waitresses and cooks. He’ll conscript your best fields, vineyards, and orchards and hand them over to his special friends. He’ll tax your harvests and vintage to support his extensive bureaucracy. Your prize workers and best animals he’ll take for his own use. He’ll lay a tax on your flocks and you’ll end up no better than slaves. The day will come when you will cry in desperation because of this king you so much want for yourselves. But don’t expect God to answer.”The predictable response of the people to the warning was this:
But the people wouldn’t listen to Samuel. “No!” they said. “We will have a king to rule us! Then we’ll be just like all the other nations. Our king will rule us and lead us and fight our battles."So those Israelites wanted to be a great and mighty Nation. They wanted to establish national pride and economic prosperity in competition with surrounding nations. Where have we heard that before ? Whether humans call their leader King, Emperor, Dictator, Premier, Prime Minister or President, the citizens of all nations bear a measure of guilt when their leaders go wrong. How well did things go for the German people who gave majority consensus to the Führer of Nazi Germany who restored German pride and National economy ? Incredibly, even the Churches [who should have known better] supported and helped in establishing that failed government. Now, I understand folks don't like hearing that. They never have when I've brought it up before, but it's a matter of documented historical fact.
|Typical Facebook Blame Game|
“We live in an age of identity politics in which people have been encouraged to define themselves by what makes them angry. You know, I mean, I would say that the more healthy definition of the self is to define it in terms of the things you value and care about and love, you know."
"But now, we seem to be—or many of us—seem to be defining ourselves by what we hate. You know, and that rage, as you say, becomes a badge of identity—becomes a kind of selfhood."
"Classically, we have defined ourselves by the things we love. By the place which is our home, by our family, by our friends. But in this age we're asked to define ourselves by hate. That what defines you is what pisses you off. And if nothing pisses you off, who are you?"
You know, Salman Rushie is absolutely correct. People's modern day beliefs and support of any cause is generally based on something they hate or what makes them angry. Rarely does anyone anymore champion something positive that they love. Of course there are exceptions, but when you watch the nightly global news reports, things really are moving more towards raw unbridled hatred. People of every side will point the finger blaming others with neither side admitting personal responsibility of guilt by association for their participation in a failed system. I think what many of the common people from both political sides often times really want is absolute dictatorial rule as long as it's their side in the position of absolute power, with democracy as a smokescreen. You know who else was right ? Margaret Thatcher, who gave a speech at the 40th Anniversary Session of UN General Assembly with the President of the United States, Ronald Reagan on October 24, 1985 where she put the blame of the failure of the United Nations squarely on the shoulders of all it's member Nations.
"Secondly, when we ask about shortcomings we should start by looking at ourselves."
"The United Nations is only a mirror held up to our own uneven, untidy and divided world. If we do not like what we see there's no point in cursing the mirror, we had better start by reforming ourselves."
When the next election [of any country] comes up, the participants will fall for the next round of manifesto after manifesto, piles upon piles of empty promises and the usual political rhetoric that goes with these party atmosphere election festivities. They will dance and cheer Viva this or that politician and totally ignore any personal responsibility on their part to actually read the fine print before their purchase. Those celebrity politicians will always reach out towards their political life-support constituents with promises of 'change,' even though that 'change' is really nothing more than the same old political pendulum swinging back and forth between political parties. Participants will once again allow themselves to be suckered into that new call for 'Change', maybe even get that rare privilege of touching or even posing for a picture with their beloved Secular Messiah and not once considering the consequences that will follow, because for just that one precious euphoric moment, all is well at the convention or celebration party. But interestingly, on the subject of that word/term, 'change,' we have another interesting biblical text which incredibly relevant to our subject here:
Proverbs 24:21Amplified Bible, Classic Edition (AMPC)
"My son, [reverently] fear the Lord (Jehovah) and the king (government), and do not associate with those who protest for change [of allegiance, and are revolutionary],"
One does wonder why most of this world's professed Christians and their churches totally ignore and do exactly the opposite of what their holy book councils against a political course with this world. After all, they are commanded to keep seperate from the world, but do exactly the opposite. But if like Mrs Thatcher said of the United Nations flawed is true, then it's true that the flaws come from the various member Nations around the globe and couldn't the same thing be said about failure of Democracy of any country in which a leader is democratically elected by a population that is no more qualified to understand, problem solve or hold a leadership role, than the one they elect ? All humans have the same identical imperfections and flaws as anyone they elect, but by nature they are not humble enough to blame themselves. Just the guy they ALL elected to be put in power, even if he/she wasn't their personal choice. See, it's called community responsibility. Many folks wonder why I so often quote many biblical texts on this subject in my posts. As I've stated before, I'm not the one who continually bring this subject up. Take the quoted text below adopted by mostly non-religious (in the conventional sense) Secular Progressive Nations who thought this quote from the bible would be appropriate outside the United Nations building:
|Outside of the United Nations building there is this inscription quoting Isaiah|
This statue or sculpture on the right was created by Evgeniy Vuchetich and wall with the quote from Isaiah 4:2 etched in stone was donated by the former Soviet Union. Can anybody name one single Nation today which says they believe this scriptural text and proves so by their actions by actually doing it ?? Not even the so-called neutral nations like Switzerland or Sweden really believe in that by their actions. So neither any secular progressive democracy or even any single nation claiming to be a theocracy run by clerics actually practice what they preach. This shouldn't be a surprise since from mankind's very beginning they chose democracy (Greek: δημοκρατία dēmokratía, literally "rule of the people"), as opposed to Theocracy (government in which a deity is the source from which all authority derives), if we are to belief Genesis Chapter three. Even today all so-called Theocracy countries are really nothing more than a sham fabricated by men. But again, are their really any true peace and security believers beyond lipservice who actually believe and follow the recommendation demanded by Isaiah 4:2 ??? I mean even a couple of decades ago, when agreements were made and signed to dismantle nuclear missiles, everyone really knew that all both sides were really doing was getting rid of old archaic technology and recycling the plutonium to put into the latest technologically advanced weaponry.
Seriously, just one Nation who has done something like this ? They fon't exist and never will exist.